Things I don’t like about Real Rank
Filed Under (Daily Posts) by
Cynthia Blue on 13-02-2008
Tagged Under : Paid Blogging
The whole page rank idea is just broken. As we all know, Google has removed the Page Rank from blogs that do paid posts. I still don’t understand why.. sure, PR is their system, and they can do with it as they please. However, quality websites can sell links, it’s our own business, and Google really can’t have any say in that. Regardless of their opinion that paid links might skew their PR system. With sites being PR0 because they sell paid links, and with sites getting PR with little or no content, the Google PR system just does not reflect the true popularity, or quality, of a website, blog or other.
Izea has come up with Real Rank, and is soon to release Social Spark. The idea is that these ranking systems don’t deal with Google at all, and mainly deal with how many unique visitors a website, mainly blogs, gets. Which sounds good…
What I don’t like about Real Rank is two things.
First, I don’t like how wildly it fluctuates on a day to day basis. One day my RR can be 2000+, and another day it can be in the 500s. I prefer the Google Page Rank in that it was stable and only updated once every three months or so.
Second, I don’t like that Real Rank is, basically, a competition between bloggers. Not everyone can be in the top 1%, or even the top 3%. The more popular blogs get the higher ranks. The less get lesser ranks. But what about good quality blogs that have good solid readership that are not getting as many unique hits? I would like to see them change that system so that if 50% of all blogs were awesome, they would all get a Real Rank of, say 9. Intead of only some of them, because maybe they get one more hit per day.
Anyway, those are my gripes. I haven’t done much for Pay Per Post in a while because my blogs do not rank very highly in their systems. And I try to focus on content than becoming popular.
*shrug*
| 2.5 |










